Phase 2 Brief (And later discussion)
---------------------------------------
Basically right now I am in a state of creative block. So what I have just done (with two days till the group proposal) is spend hours and hours looking at the best inspiration I could find on the net re: what I percieve to be the subject at hand. The result is a large number of amazing ideas but sadly no sparks of inspiration just yet. Rather than dispair though, I think I will sleep on it and show the rest of the group my findings tomorrow. With luck even if we have no amazing new flashes of inspiration we can cut and recombine the existing ideas in order to progressively move forward.
Here is the list of links I have covered today. I am not going to post a description just yet but I will soon as I feel they will be important for the next step in the process.
Ideas
Making something generally invisible visible
LED Shirts to display information/pictures
Creating a wearable device that transfers/converts data into something usable (weather reports change t shirt colour using W/Networks, for instance)
Visualising sound in 3D (even in physical form?)
Interaction (with 3D Space)
Using a wiimote with MAX/Processing to locate an object in 3d space/Head tracking
Motion sensors mapping movement to 3d space on a projector.
Taking data collected externally and visualising it in an interesting/comprehensive way
Taking social experiments (psychology) and visualising the results on video/3D sculpture 2D Artwork
Modelling mathematical abstractions in rapid prototyping (already done)
Peform a social experiment and then visualise the results
Observing people/events/phenomena, take a dataset using some method that deliberately provokes thought/discussion and then present that data in an unexpected way
Present data out of context (much like Borat or Michael Moore) in order to influence how people think about it, and THEN present that same data in context
Notes
Digital vs reality... or even mixed reality (video?)
A digital format would be more asthetic, but a real object would be more permanent. Combining both (circuitry with say, a sculpture and a video camera) would create a bigger impact on whoever interacts with the piece.
Art vs Design
Our instructors have been (deliberately?) ambiguous with this, but I would like to produce something interesting, although whether it is useful or not I think is not all that important at this stage.
Innovative approach
Not having much (if any) money to spend will surely have an impact on what we do here. But such emerging technology as camspace, combined with Processing (free) and about $40 of kit has the potential to create a fully functional VR space. If we are capable of this in the times we live in then if we can get access to a camera/arduino/rapid prototyping through AUT then I see no limit to what we can potentially create here.
Presentation Methods
In my research I have found many contemporary techniques of presenting data such as tag clouds, various kinds of graph, relating size to frequency/quantity, relating colour to mood etc etc. I would seek to question these rather than conform. I think that 2D presentation methods are approaching staleness while 3D methods are all looking very sharp in order to introduce that 'design' edge. Again, I would question that through discussion with my group.
Infact in a sense the lack of limits is the equivalent of being given a blank page and a pencil and a white room. This is perhaps the opposite sensation to the 1000 poly limit we had last semester! But I digress... =)
Phase 2 – GROUP PROJECTS
Tuesday 23 – Friday Aug 22
• In response to the models presented (not the data), and the issues arising
from them, form groups of 3 in order to generate a proposal for a new data
based project that requires gathering further sets of data. The resulting group
project will culminate in a new model and should combine at least 3 sets of data
(or equivalent), that may be related or divergent. Each group will have a lecturer
assigned to it to provide on-going input and support during the project. List of
group members to James by Tuesday 29 July.
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
Monday 4 Aug. 10am
Each group is to make a 15-minute presentation about their intended project.
Lecturers will consider the proposals and either approve them or ask for further
work to be done before commencing.
The proposals should identify the source of the data, the methods of gathering it,
equipment needed, the role of team members and a timeline of key points.
Several approaches to modelling the data should be considered and discussed
without predetermining the final outcome of the project. In addition to this
presentation this proposal is to be written up to refer back to at the conclusion of
the project. Please supply hard copy to James following your presentation. This
may be in the form of PowerPoint slides and notes.
The proposals are developed simultaneously with workshops run during week two
so that your groups are ready to present their project proposals on Monday 4 Aug.
The techniques and methods for gathering the data is part of the project and
needs to be fully documented and supported by an on-going project log. The
gathering of data may necessitate the construction of equipment especially for
this purpose and should be included in the project proposal.
Phase 3 – REVIEWS, PRESENTATIONS AND ASSESSMENTS.
MID-PROJECT REVIEW.
Wednesday 13 Aug- as scheduled.
Formally present to lecturers your progress to date. This is intended to focus the team on
achieving the project outcomes by identifying significant breakthroughs and any problems that
are being encountered. Depending on the nature of individual projects data gathering,
modelling and analysis may be at different stages. It is expect that significant progress has been
made towards the project outcomes at this stage and evidence of this, and reflective analysis, is
available.
PRESENTATIONS
2pm Aug 21 -10am Aug 22 – as scheduled.
Finished project outcomes, data and documentation are presented to the class for peer
assessment. This presentation may take any form depending on the nature of the project. Work
should be presented in a professional manner relevant to the project.
FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
2pm Friday 22 Aug
Complete projects are presented for assessment. Lecturers assigned to each group will advise on
an appropriate form for this to take. Whenever possible actual outcomes should be presented as
well as documentation, project log and reflective analysis. Comprehensive documentation
should be available online through a project web page with links from individual team members’
pages. While the web pages will not be assessed as part of this project they are a requirement.
---------------------------------------
Basically right now I am in a state of creative block. So what I have just done (with two days till the group proposal) is spend hours and hours looking at the best inspiration I could find on the net re: what I percieve to be the subject at hand. The result is a large number of amazing ideas but sadly no sparks of inspiration just yet. Rather than dispair though, I think I will sleep on it and show the rest of the group my findings tomorrow. With luck even if we have no amazing new flashes of inspiration we can cut and recombine the existing ideas in order to progressively move forward.
Here is the list of links I have covered today. I am not going to post a description just yet but I will soon as I feel they will be important for the next step in the process.
- Inspiration
- http://moodstream.gettyimages.com/
- http://www.weboffate.com/visualization/
- http://www.brendandawes.com/sketches/redux/
- http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/06/urgently_infosculpture.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890
- http://www.semiconductorfilms.com/root/Magnetic_Movie/Magnetic.htm
- http://www.chrisharrison.net/projects/diggrings/
- http://www.bestiario.org/research/videosphere/
- http://www.semiconductorfilms.com/BN_Exhibition.htm
- http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2008/06/stop_motion_graphic_equal.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890
- http://infosthetics.com/archives/2008/05/massive_digital_ceiling_clock.html
- http://labs.live.com/photosynth/
- http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/05/09/timetube-the-timeline-that-youtube-should-built/
- http://www.designsupremo.com/index.cfm?action=product.detail&department=art&product=a-b-peace-terror-etc--d0
- http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~johnny/steadycam/
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw
- http://www.abigailreynolds.com/mntF/mntFmain.html
- http://www.flare-facade.com/
- http://creativity-online.com/
- http://infosthetics.com/archives/2008/07/lasercut_sound_analysis_sculptures.html
- http://www.spectrumatlas.org/spectrum/
- http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/23/movies/20080223_REVENUE_GRAPHIC.html
- http://www.avoision.com/experiments/pi10k/index.php
- http://lastgraph3.aeracode.org/
- http://iwantyoutowantme.org/
- http://www.core77.com/competitions/GreenerGadgets/
- http://www.yankodesign.com/index.php/2008/01/14/saver-clip-shames-your-electricity-usage/
- http://marumushi.com/apps/newsmap/newsmap.cfm
- http://social.cs.uiuc.edu/projects/conversationclock.html
- http://infosthetics.com/archives/2007/10/the_impact_of_social_data_visualization_infovis_workshop.html#extended
- http://www.digital.udk-berlin.de/en/projects/summer07/haupt/bodytech/googlering.html
- http://www.urbaneye.net/
- http://www.nickdlobo.com/wordpress/
- http://www.christianmeinke.com/2007/04/10/wiimote-communication/
- http://youniverse.com/personality/feedback/de9dbf85eb0ccc0a03e452175a5bef1a
- imagini.net
- oskope.com
- http://infosthetics.com/archives/2007/02/browsegoods_visual_shopping.html
- http://infosthetics.com/archives/2007/08/adobe_building_semaphore.html#more
- http://content.stamen.com/som_transbay_tower
- http://www.snibbe.com/scott/public/youarehere/video.html
- feel fine
Ideas
Making something generally invisible visible
LED Shirts to display information/pictures
Creating a wearable device that transfers/converts data into something usable (weather reports change t shirt colour using W/Networks, for instance)
Visualising sound in 3D (even in physical form?)
Interaction (with 3D Space)
Using a wiimote with MAX/Processing to locate an object in 3d space/Head tracking
Motion sensors mapping movement to 3d space on a projector.
Taking data collected externally and visualising it in an interesting/comprehensive way
Taking social experiments (psychology) and visualising the results on video/3D sculpture 2D Artwork
Modelling mathematical abstractions in rapid prototyping (already done)
Peform a social experiment and then visualise the results
Observing people/events/phenomena, take a dataset using some method that deliberately provokes thought/discussion and then present that data in an unexpected way
Present data out of context (much like Borat or Michael Moore) in order to influence how people think about it, and THEN present that same data in context
Notes
Digital vs reality... or even mixed reality (video?)
A digital format would be more asthetic, but a real object would be more permanent. Combining both (circuitry with say, a sculpture and a video camera) would create a bigger impact on whoever interacts with the piece.
Art vs Design
Our instructors have been (deliberately?) ambiguous with this, but I would like to produce something interesting, although whether it is useful or not I think is not all that important at this stage.
Innovative approach
Not having much (if any) money to spend will surely have an impact on what we do here. But such emerging technology as camspace, combined with Processing (free) and about $40 of kit has the potential to create a fully functional VR space. If we are capable of this in the times we live in then if we can get access to a camera/arduino/rapid prototyping through AUT then I see no limit to what we can potentially create here.
Presentation Methods
In my research I have found many contemporary techniques of presenting data such as tag clouds, various kinds of graph, relating size to frequency/quantity, relating colour to mood etc etc. I would seek to question these rather than conform. I think that 2D presentation methods are approaching staleness while 3D methods are all looking very sharp in order to introduce that 'design' edge. Again, I would question that through discussion with my group.
Infact in a sense the lack of limits is the equivalent of being given a blank page and a pencil and a white room. This is perhaps the opposite sensation to the 1000 poly limit we had last semester! But I digress... =)
Labels:
Data,
Semester 1
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments: